[Free-RTC Discuss] selecting best C/C++ jitter buffer?

[Elisa Nectoux]

Hi Julien and Daniel (and everyone),

Thank you very much Julien for speaking about oRTP.
Our company, Belledonne Communications (the company backing the Linphone project), invested a lot of its R&D effort in improving the audio and video quality. 
For more information about oRTP’s innovative jitter buffer algorithm, you can read our article online : http://www.linphone.org/news/introduction-our-new-rtp-adaptive-jitter-buffer-algorithm <http://www.linphone.org/news/introduction-our-new-rtp-adaptive-jitter-buffer-algorithm>
To know more about oRTP : http://www.linphone.org/technical-corner/ortp <http://www.linphone.org/technical-corner/ortp>

Do not hesitate to contact me directly if you have questions about oRTP and Linphone’s jitter buffer.

Best regards,

Elisa Nectoux
Sales & Marketing

+33 (0)9 52 63 65 05
elisa.nectoux at belledonne-communications.com

> Le 11 avr. 2019 à 12:13, Lorenzo Miniero <lminiero at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> I think I remember one being available in Speex as well, but I may be wrong.
> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, 09:34 Julien Chavanton, <jchavanton at gmail.com <mailto:jchavanton at gmail.com>> wrote:
> There is an interesting adaptive jitter buffer in oRTP that was improved a few years ago, 
> it is the coded domain, dealing with RTP packets, so it will have to drop packets if it needs to accelerate. 
> 
> The one in WebRTC "NetEQ" will to fast accelerate in the decoded domain.
> 
> Both of them are kind of tightly coupled to the application / library 
> 
> Cheers,
> Julien
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:35 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.pro <mailto:daniel at pocock.pro>> wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> We've been using sipXtapi as part of reSIProcate's librecon (User agent
> library).  Unfortunately, the jitter buffer in the free version of
> sipXtapi is not ideal when there are occasional periods of high latency.
>  When latency comes back to normal, the audio is being replayed with a
> fast-forwarding sound effect.
> 
> I'd like to provide an alternative option in the packages that I'm
> building.  Many other products include jitter buffers that we could borrow.
> 
> Could anybody make any suggestion about which implementation to use?
> 
> It needs to be C or C++
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.freertc.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.freertc.org>
> http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.freertc.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.freertc.org>
> http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.freertc.org
> http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freertc.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190415/b6e88be5/attachment-0001.html>