[Free-RTC Discuss] selecting best C/C++ jitter buffer?

[Lorenzo Miniero]

I think I remember one being available in Speex as well, but I may be wrong.

Lorenzo

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, 09:34 Julien Chavanton, <jchavanton at gmail.com> wrote:

> There is an interesting adaptive jitter buffer in oRTP that was improved a
> few years ago,
> it is the coded domain, dealing with RTP packets, so it will have to drop
> packets if it needs to accelerate.
>
> The one in WebRTC "NetEQ" will to fast accelerate in the decoded domain.
>
> Both of them are kind of tightly coupled to the application / library
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:35 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.pro> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> We've been using sipXtapi as part of reSIProcate's librecon (User agent
>> library).  Unfortunately, the jitter buffer in the free version of
>> sipXtapi is not ideal when there are occasional periods of high latency.
>>  When latency comes back to normal, the audio is being replayed with a
>> fast-forwarding sound effect.
>>
>> I'd like to provide an alternative option in the packages that I'm
>> building.  Many other products include jitter buffers that we could
>> borrow.
>>
>> Could anybody make any suggestion about which implementation to use?
>>
>> It needs to be C or C++
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.freertc.org
>> http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.freertc.org
> http://lists.freertc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freertc.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190411/70e5c5da/attachment.html>